All matches

Moss FK — Egersunds IK, First Division

Norway, First Division

Moss FK
LWLWL
—
Egersunds IK
LLDDD
Team strength by Elo, 0 to 5What this means

Strength is the team’s Elo rating rescaled to 0–5 across all matches in the competition: it rises after wins over strong opponents and falls after losses to weak ones. The bar colour is the tier: red — weak, amber — below average, green — solid, blue — the strongest. The letters under the bar are the last five matches: W — win, D — draw, L — loss.

Outcome probability
38%24%38%
Moss FK38%Draw24%Egersunds IK38%

Model vs market

Our probability against the one implied by the bookmaker price. The Δ column is the gap in percentage points.

OutcomeModelMarketΔ
1Moss FK38%2.61—
XDraw24%4.16—
2Egersunds IK38%2.65—

our modelmarket — implied by the bookmaker price

Quick markets

The three most common questions — our probability next to the bookmaker line.

Both teams to score

Yes63%

ours 1.60

No37%

ours 2.67

Over 2.5 goals

This market opens with a subscription.

Sign up

Over 9.5 corners

This market opens with a subscription.

Sign up

Average totals by team

A plain average for each side over its most recent matches — what the totals grow out of. A fact, not a model forecast.

MetricMoss FKEgersunds IKCombined
Goals scored1.170.832.00
Conceded1.832.334.16
Corners10.89.09.9
Cards1.02.63.6
Offsides
Throw-ins
Fouls
xG
Shots
Shots on target

The other six metrics — with a subscription

Free full access for 3 days when you sign up

Average over the last 5 completed matches of each team. The combined column adds the two sides; only corners are averaged, because they already arrive as a match total.

Confident answers

The line the model is most sure about — and how often such answers have come in.

Goals

This market opens with a subscription.

Sign up

70%of such answers on goals came inlast 60 days · 890 matches

Corners

This market opens with a subscription.

Sign up

69%of such answers on corners came inlast 60 days · 889 matches

Cards

This market opens with a subscription.

Sign up

69%of such answers on cards came inlast 60 days · 886 matches

This is a probability, not a guarantee: roughly 3 answers in 10 don’t come in. Bookmaker odds on these lines are low — this block shows the model’s accuracy, not the value of a bet.

Why the model reads the match this way

Short answers to the key questions of the match. Tap a question to see the numbers by team and half.

Moss FKEgersunds IK

Moss FK 38%, Egersunds IK 38%. The safest is “No draw” at 75%.

Moss FK 38%Draw 24%Egersunds IK 38%
1st half
36 · 34 · 30
2nd half
39 · 33 · 28
Both teams to score?
How many goals?
How many corners?
How many yellow cards?
How many shots?
How many fouls?
How many offsides?

The full analysis and both conclusions — with a subscription

More possible scenarios

Three options at different prices of risk.

Conservativehigh probability, modest price
Basebalance of probability and price

Total corners: Under 11.5

67%
High variancelow probability, high price

Two more scenarios — with a subscription

Form and context

Moss FK

  • homeKongsvinger IL0:2
  • awaySandnes Ulf2:1
  • homeHaugesund1:4
  • awayStabæk Fotball3:2
  • homeStrømmen IF1:2

Egersunds IK

  • awayRanheim Fotball0:5
  • awayOdds1:5
  • homeKongsvinger IL1:1
  • awayFC Lyn Oslo1:1
  • homeÅsane Fotball2:2

Head to head

  • 07/04/26First Division0:3
  • 10/22/25First Division0:2
  • 06/28/25First Division2:4
  • 08/26/24First Division2:3
  • 04/27/24First Division1:2

League table

Both teams and their nearest neighbours.

#TeamPWDLGoalsPts
7IL Hødd241041040:4834
8Ranheim Fotball24941161:5831
9Egersunds IK24851136:4929
10FC Lyn Oslo24841239:4928
11Strømmen IF24751238:5526
12Sandnes Ulf24741335:4525
13Moss FK24741338:5425
14Sogndal Fotball23651238:5323
15Åsane Fotball24551434:5320

Full breakdown

Every market the model prices. Our probability on the left, fair odds and the bookmaker line on the right.

Full breakdown, scenarios and analysis — with a subscription

Free full access for 3 days when you sign up

Probabilities are a model estimate, not a guarantee.