All matches

Mito Hollyhock — Urawa Red Diamonds, J1 League

Japan, J1 League

Mito Hollyhock
LLDWD
—
Urawa Red Diamonds
WLWWW
Team strength by Elo, 0 to 5What this means

Strength is the team’s Elo rating rescaled to 0–5 across all matches in the competition: it rises after wins over strong opponents and falls after losses to weak ones. The bar colour is the tier: red — weak, amber — below average, green — solid, blue — the strongest. The letters under the bar are the last five matches: W — win, D — draw, L — loss.

Outcome probability
41%25%34%
Mito Hollyhock41%Draw25%Urawa Red Diamonds34%

Model vs market

Our probability against the one implied by the bookmaker price. The Δ column is the gap in percentage points.

OutcomeModelMarketΔ
1Mito Hollyhock41%2.43—
XDraw25%4.03—
2Urawa Red Diamonds34%2.93—

our modelmarket — implied by the bookmaker price

Quick markets

The three most common questions — our probability next to the bookmaker line.

Both teams to score

Yes58%

ours 1.72

No42%

ours 2.40

Over 2.5 goals

This market opens with a subscription.

Sign up

Over 9.5 corners

This market opens with a subscription.

Sign up

Average totals by team

A plain average for each side over its most recent matches — what the totals grow out of. A fact, not a model forecast.

MetricMito HollyhockUrawa Red DiamondsCombined
Goals scored1.001.832.83
Conceded1.171.172.34
Corners6.69.88.2
Cards1.61.22.8
Offsides
Throw-ins
Fouls
xG
Shots
Shots on target

The other six metrics — with a subscription

Free full access for 3 days when you sign up

Average over the last 5 completed matches of each team. The combined column adds the two sides; only corners are averaged, because they already arrive as a match total.

Confident answers

The line the model is most sure about — and how often such answers have come in.

Goals

This market opens with a subscription.

Sign up

70%of such answers on goals came inlast 60 days · 890 matches

Corners

This market opens with a subscription.

Sign up

69%of such answers on corners came inlast 60 days · 889 matches

Cards

This market opens with a subscription.

Sign up

69%of such answers on cards came inlast 60 days · 886 matches

This is a probability, not a guarantee: roughly 3 answers in 10 don’t come in. Bookmaker odds on these lines are low — this block shows the model’s accuracy, not the value of a bet.

Why the model reads the match this way

Short answers to the key questions of the match. Tap a question to see the numbers by team and half.

Mito HollyhockUrawa Red Diamonds

Mito Hollyhock 41%, Urawa Red Diamonds 34%. The safest is “No draw” at 75%.

Mito Hollyhock 41%Draw 25%Urawa Red Diamonds 34%
1st half
36 · 38 · 26
2nd half
28 · 38 · 33
Both teams to score?
How many goals?
How many corners?
How many yellow cards?
How many shots?
How many fouls?
How many offsides?

The full analysis and both conclusions — with a subscription

More possible scenarios

Three options at different prices of risk.

Conservativehigh probability, modest price
Basebalance of probability and price

Total corners: Under 10.5

69%
High variancelow probability, high price

Two more scenarios — with a subscription

Form and context

Mito Hollyhock

  • awayYokohama F. Marinos0:2
  • homeKawasaki Frontale0:1
  • awayAvispa Fukuoka1:1
  • homeKashima Antlers4:2
  • homeFC Machida Zelvia1:1

Urawa Red Diamonds

  • homeTokyo Verdy3:1
  • homeFagiano Okayama1:2
  • awayKashima Antlers1:0
  • awayAvispa Fukuoka3:2
  • homeYokohama F. Marinos3:2

Head to head

No head-to-head matches on record.

League table

Both teams and their nearest neighbours.

#TeamPWDLGoalsPts
8Kashima Antlers841317:1613
9Fagiano Okayama841311:1013
10Urawa Red Diamonds840416:1812
11Cerezo Osaka83237:1211
12Shimizu S-Pulse83146:810
13Mito Hollyhock823311:119
14Kyoto Sanga FC822411:158
15V-Varen Nagasaki822410:158

Full breakdown

Every market the model prices. Our probability on the left, fair odds and the bookmaker line on the right.

Full breakdown, scenarios and analysis — with a subscription

Free full access for 3 days when you sign up

Probabilities are a model estimate, not a guarantee.