Both teams to score
Yes55%
ours 1.81
No45%
ours 2.23
All matches
—
Clermont Foot 63 — En Avant Guingamp, Ligue 2
France, Ligue 2
Clermont Foot 63
DDDDD
En Avant Guingamp
LWDDL
Team strength by Elo, 0 to 5?What this means
Strength is the team’s Elo rating rescaled to 0–5 across all matches in the competition: it rises after wins over strong opponents and falls after losses to weak ones. The bar colour is the tier: red — weak, amber — below average, green — solid, blue — the strongest. The letters under the bar are the last five matches: W — win, D — draw, L — loss.
Outcome probability
39%26%35%
Clermont Foot 6339%Draw26%En Avant Guingamp35%
Model vs market
Our probability against the one implied by the bookmaker price. The Δ column is the gap in percentage points.
OutcomeModelMarketΔ
1Clermont Foot 632.56—
XDraw3.79—
2En Avant Guingamp2.89—
our modelmarket — implied by the bookmaker price
Average totals by team
A plain average for each side over its most recent matches — what the totals grow out of. A fact, not a model forecast.
MetricClermont Foot 63En Avant GuingampCombined
Goals scored0.331.331.66
Conceded0.331.501.83
Corners9.06.87.9
Cards2.01.33.3
Offsides
Throw-ins
Fouls
xG
Shots
Shots on target
The other six metrics — with a subscription
Free full access for 3 days when you sign up
Average over the last 5 completed matches of each team. The combined column adds the two sides; only corners are averaged, because they already arrive as a match total.
Confident answers
The line the model is most sure about — and how often such answers have come in.
Goals
This market opens with a subscription.
Sign up70%of such answers on goals came inlast 60 days · 890 matches
Corners
This market opens with a subscription.
Sign up69%of such answers on corners came inlast 60 days · 889 matches
Cards
This market opens with a subscription.
Sign up69%of such answers on cards came inlast 60 days · 886 matches
This is a probability, not a guarantee: roughly 3 answers in 10 don’t come in. Bookmaker odds on these lines are low — this block shows the model’s accuracy, not the value of a bet.
Why the model reads the match this way
Short answers to the key questions of the match. Tap a question to see the numbers by team and half.
Clermont Foot 63En Avant Guingamp
Clermont Foot 63 39%, En Avant Guingamp 35%. The safest is “No draw” at 74%.
Clermont Foot 63 39%Draw 26%En Avant Guingamp 35%
1st half
29 · 41 · 30
2nd half
31 · 36 · 33
Both teams to score?
How many goals?
How many corners?
How many yellow cards?
How many shots?
How many fouls?
How many offsides?
The full analysis and both conclusions — with a subscription
More possible scenarios
Three options at different prices of risk.
Total cards: Over 2.5
71%
Two more scenarios — with a subscription
Form and context
Clermont Foot 63
- awayGrenoble Foot 381:1
- homeUS Boulogne-sur-Mer Côte d'Opale0:0
- awayUS du Littoral de Dunkerque1:1
- homeFC Sochaux-Montbéliard0:0
- homeDijon FCO1:1
En Avant Guingamp
- homeRed Star FC 931:3
- homeFC Annecy2:1
- awayStade de Reims2:2
- homeFC Nantes3:3
- awayFC Sochaux-Montbéliard0:1
Head to head
- 05/09/26Ligue 21:0
- 10/24/25Ligue 21:0
- 03/07/25Ligue 21:3
- 10/05/24Ligue 24:1
League table
Both teams and their nearest neighbours.
#TeamPWDLGoalsPts
9
Dijon FCO723210:109
Dijon FCO723210:10910
Pau FC72236:68
Pau FC72236:6811En Avant Guingamp722310:128
En Avant Guingamp722310:12812
US du Littoral de Dunkerque722310:128
US du Littoral de Dunkerque722310:12813
Grenoble Foot 3872238:118
Grenoble Foot 3872238:11814
Rodez Aveyron Football721414:167
Rodez Aveyron Football721414:16715
FC Nantes72149:137
FC Nantes72149:13716Clermont Foot 6370614:66
Clermont Foot 6370614:6617
US Boulogne-sur-Mer Côte d'Opale70523:55
US Boulogne-sur-Mer Côte d'Opale70523:5518
Stade Lavallois Mayenne FC71248:145
Stade Lavallois Mayenne FC71248:145Full breakdown
Every market the model prices. Our probability on the left, fair odds and the bookmaker line on the right.
Full breakdown, scenarios and analysis — with a subscription
Free full access for 3 days when you sign up
Probabilities are a model estimate, not a guarantee.