All matches

Nagoya Grampus — Kyoto Sanga FC, J1 League

Japan, J1 League

Nagoya Grampus
LLLLW
—
Kyoto Sanga FC
WLLDW
Team strength by Elo, 0 to 5What this means

Strength is the team’s Elo rating rescaled to 0–5 across all matches in the competition: it rises after wins over strong opponents and falls after losses to weak ones. The bar colour is the tier: red — weak, amber — below average, green — solid, blue — the strongest. The letters under the bar are the last five matches: W — win, D — draw, L — loss.

Outcome probability
36%25%39%
Nagoya Grampus36%Draw25%Kyoto Sanga FC39%

Model vs market

Our probability against the one implied by the bookmaker price. The Δ column is the gap in percentage points.

OutcomeModelMarketΔ
1Nagoya Grampus36%2.74—
XDraw25%4.03—
2Kyoto Sanga FC39%2.58—

our modelmarket — implied by the bookmaker price

Quick markets

The three most common questions — our probability next to the bookmaker line.

Both teams to score

Yes57%

ours 1.76

No43%

ours 2.31

Over 2.5 goals

This market opens with a subscription.

Sign up

Over 9.5 corners

This market opens with a subscription.

Sign up

Average totals by team

A plain average for each side over its most recent matches — what the totals grow out of. A fact, not a model forecast.

MetricNagoya GrampusKyoto Sanga FCCombined
Goals scored0.000.330.33
Conceded0.170.170.34
Corners6.010.08.0
Cards1.02.03.0
Offsides
Throw-ins
Fouls
xG
Shots
Shots on target

The other six metrics — with a subscription

Free full access for 3 days when you sign up

Average over the last 5 completed matches of each team. The combined column adds the two sides; only corners are averaged, because they already arrive as a match total.

Confident answers

The line the model is most sure about — and how often such answers have come in.

Goals

This market opens with a subscription.

Sign up

70%of such answers on goals came inlast 60 days · 890 matches

Corners

This market opens with a subscription.

Sign up

69%of such answers on corners came inlast 60 days · 889 matches

Cards

This market opens with a subscription.

Sign up

69%of such answers on cards came inlast 60 days · 886 matches

This is a probability, not a guarantee: roughly 3 answers in 10 don’t come in. Bookmaker odds on these lines are low — this block shows the model’s accuracy, not the value of a bet.

Why the model reads the match this way

Short answers to the key questions of the match. Tap a question to see the numbers by team and half.

Nagoya GrampusKyoto Sanga FC

Nagoya Grampus 36%, Kyoto Sanga FC 39%. The safest is “No draw” at 75%.

Nagoya Grampus 36%Draw 25%Kyoto Sanga FC 39%
1st half
35 · 42 · 23
2nd half
33 · 35 · 33
Both teams to score?
How many goals?
How many corners?
How many yellow cards?
How many shots?
How many fouls?
How many offsides?

The full analysis and both conclusions — with a subscription

More possible scenarios

Three options at different prices of risk.

Conservativehigh probability, modest price
Basebalance of probability and price

Total goals: Under 3.5

71%
High variancelow probability, high price

Two more scenarios — with a subscription

Form and context

Nagoya Grampus

  • awayFC Tokyo0:1
  • awayV-Varen Nagasaki0:2
  • homeFC Machida Zelvia1:3
  • awaySanfrecce Hiroshima0:3
  • homeFagiano Okayama2:1

Kyoto Sanga FC

  • awayFagiano Okayama2:1
  • homeKashiwa Reysol2:3
  • awayFC Tokyo0:2
  • awayYokohama F. Marinos1:1
  • homeAvispa Fukuoka2:1

Head to head

  • 08/10/25J1 League1:2
  • 05/11/25J1 League1:1
  • 08/07/24J1 League2:3
  • 05/26/24J1 League1:1

League table

Both teams and their nearest neighbours.

#TeamPWDLGoalsPts
12Shimizu S-Pulse83146:810
13Mito Hollyhock823311:119
14Kyoto Sanga FC822411:158
15V-Varen Nagasaki822410:158
16Gamba Osaka81348:146
17Nagoya Grampus82067:146
18Avispa Fukuoka81169:124
19Tokyo Verdy80444:124

Full breakdown

Every market the model prices. Our probability on the left, fair odds and the bookmaker line on the right.

Full breakdown, scenarios and analysis — with a subscription

Free full access for 3 days when you sign up

Probabilities are a model estimate, not a guarantee.